Plaintiff seeks to quiet title against Realia LLC for a disputed land tract.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS MORROW COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO. 2025 CV 00143 JUDGE ROBERT C. HICKSON, JR. PUBLIC NOTICE Shirley M. Schaefer, Plaintiff, v. Realia LLC, Defendant. Defendant,  Realia LLC ("Realia"), whose place of residence is  unknown and whose last known address is listed for the statutory agent: 175 S. Sandusky Street, Box 352, Delaware, Ohio  43015, and who cannot be served within the State of Ohio, will  take notice that on November 12, 2025, Shirely M. Schafer (the  "Plaintiff"), filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of   Morrow County, Ohio, in Case No. 2025 CV 00143 against  Realia (the "Complaint"), seeking to quiet title against it as to a  portion of land described in the Complaint as the "T&OC Tract,"  which is located within a 55-acre parcel of real property located  at 2680 State Route 61, Marengo, Lincoln Township, Morrow  County, Ohio, Lot 24, Parcel No. J25-001-00-316-00 (the  "Property"). The Property is more fully described as set forth in  the Complaint as filed in the Morrow County Clerk of Court's office. The T&OC Tract was transferred to Realia by Zeus Investments, Inc. by two (2) separate Quit Claim Deeds recorded in  Deed Book 1036 at Pages 16-18 on December 2, 2021, and in  Deed Book 1041 at Pages 744-748 on January 28, 2022, of the  deed records of the Morrow County Recorder. The T&OC Tract  is more fully described as set forth in the Complaint as filed in  the Morrow County Clerk of Court's Office. The Complaint alleges that the T&OC Tract divides the Property into two separate  parcels, one of 4.976 acres fronting and accessible from State  Route 61 ("Parcel A"), and the other of 50.249 acres essentially  landlocked by the intersecting T&OC Tract ("Parcel B"); and that  the T&OC Tract has been abandoned for more than four decades; that Plaintiff and her predecessors in title have had continuous, exclusive, open, notorious, and adverse possession of the  T&OC Tract for a period exceeding twenty-one (21) years, including the ingress and egress of Parcel B from Parcel A by way  of a gravel driveway that traverses over the T&OC Tract (the  "Access Tract"). The Access Tract is more fully described as set  forth in the Complaint as filed in the Morrow County Clerk of  Court's Office. The Complaint further alleges that at all times relevant Plaintiff has used Parcel B for farming, lumber sale and  production, and as residential property by the use of heavy farm  and construction equipment, accessing Parcel B from Parcel A  over the Access Tract without objection by Realia;  that Plaintiff's  use of the T&OC Tract, including the Access Tract, has been  without permission of Realia and its predecessors, hostile to  their interests, and under a claim of right; that neither Realia nor  its predecessors have ever maintained, used, or asserted control  of the Access Tract during the statutory period; that Realia's prolonged non-use of the T&OC Tract, including the Access Tract,  coupled with its failure to object to Plaintiff's exclusive use and  improvements of the Property demonstrates an intent to abandon its purported ownership thereof; that to the extent that  Realia continues to claim ownership of the T&OC Tract or attempts to make any potential claim of an easement right through  the Property by way of the T&OC Tract, those claims now  threaten to obstruct Plaintiff's use, access, and enjoyment of the  Property, including her right to alienation thereof; that Plaintiff is  entitled to permanent ownership of the entire T&OC Tract or, at  a minimum, ownership of or easement rights to the Access Tract  under the principles of adverse possession, prescriptive easement, or easement implied by prior use or necessity; that Plaintiff is entitled to have the Court declare that Plaintiff holds title to  the T&OC Tract by adverse possession; that in the alternative  the Court should declare that Realia has no right, title, or interest  in the Access Tract, including any easement rights over or  through the Access Tract, whether by grant or implication, and  that any such claimed easement rights have been extinguished  by abandonment or prescription; that in the alternative the Court  should declare that Plaintiff has established an easement by prescription, necessity, or prior use over and through the T&OC  Tract through the Access Tract; and that the Court should award  Plaintiff her costs and reasonable attorney's fees against Realia  in bringing the action and grant such other and further relief as  the Court deems just and proper under the circumstances. Realia is further notified that it is required to answer said Complaint on or before 28 days after the last week that this publication has run for SIX successive weeks, or judgment may be rendered as prayed for therein.  Respectfully submitted, LUPER NEIDENTHAL & LOGAN A Legal Professional Association Scott C. Walker (0063631) E-mail: swalker@lnlattorneys.com Attorney for Plaintiff  February 25, March 4, 11, 18, 25, April 1, 2026  6T 90218598