Court Filings

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted an application for an interlocutory appeal in the case KLS Heating & Air, Inc. v. Juliette Hamler Locke, et al. The court ordered that the appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the April 30, 2026 order and directed the clerk of the state court to include this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. This is a procedural interlocutory-order grant allowing the appeal to proceed before final judgment.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the appellant's motion to withdraw the appeal in case A26A0693, Ralph Van Pelt, Jr. v. Community and Southern Bank (successor to First National Bank of Georgia). The court released jurisdiction back to the trial court upon issuance of the order. The decision is administrative and dispositional: the appeal was terminated at the appellant's request and control over the case returned to the lower court.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the appellant Hardy Foods, LLC's motion to withdraw its appeal in the case against Mackenzie Morgan. The court released jurisdiction back to the trial court effective upon receipt of the order, meaning the appellate matter is terminated and further proceedings will occur in the trial court. The decision is procedural: the court accepted the voluntary withdrawal and took no action on the merits of the underlying dispute.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the City of Sandy Springs' motion to withdraw its appeal in the case against the City of Atlanta. By allowing withdrawal, the Court released jurisdiction back to the trial court effective upon receipt of this order. The document is a short procedural court order effectuating the appellant's request rather than a merits decision.

The Third District Court of Appeal granted a writ of certiorari and quashed the trial court’s February 6 and February 19, 2026 discovery orders that compelled the petitioner to appear for an in-person deposition in Miami-Dade County after a final default judgment had been entered. The appellate court concluded that once a final judgment is entered, the trial court lacks authority to order depositions in the case in chief and may only permit post-judgment discovery limited to execution or certain narrow exceptions not present here. Because the discovery orders sought materials and testimony that should have been obtained before judgment, they were improper and subject to certiorari relief.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the City of Atlanta's application for an interlocutory appeal in the case City of Atlanta v. William Neal. The order permits the appellant to file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the order date (April 28, 2026) and directs the Clerk of State Court to include this order in the record sent to the Court of Appeals. The court's action is procedural—allowing review before final judgment—rather than resolving the underlying merits of the dispute.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the appellant's motion to withdraw their appeal in Seres Capital GA, LLC v. Betty Jean Cook. By granting the motion the appellate court released jurisdiction back to the trial court, meaning the appeal is no longer active before the Court of Appeals and the case returns to the lower court for further proceedings. The order is a ministerial grant of withdrawal rather than a decision on the merits of the underlying dispute.

The Court of Appeal granted Karla Amezcua’s petition for a writ of mandate and ordered the trial court to remove a condition requiring her to pay Massage Envy’s attorney fees as a term of leave to amend her complaint. The trial court had sustained Massage Envy’s demurrer but conditioned granting Amezcua leave to amend on payment of $25,000 in fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 473. The appellate court held section 473 does not authorize shifting attorney fees and that fee-shifting must be grounded in statute or agreement; the trial court therefore erred by imposing a fee condition under section 473.

The court granted a petition for writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its January 7, 2026 order that allowed a defendant to add four third-party defendants late in a long-running ownership and fraud dispute. The appellate court held the trial judge abused his discretion because adding new parties at that stage—after nearly five years of litigation and many prior trial settings—would unreasonably delay the case; the trial court’s ruling to vacate the March 23, 2026 setting was the primary harm. The court found the proposed third parties were not indispensable and that the delay was not reasonable under the case history.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted an application for interlocutory appeal by Triduum Associates, LLC and others in their case against Holly Springs, Georgia. The court's order allows the appellant to file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days and directs the superior court clerk to include this order in the record sent to the Court of Appeals. The decision is procedural: it merely authorizes taking an immediate appeal before final judgment and sets short timing and transmission instructions for the record.

The Court of Appeal granted petitioner Michelle Paknad’s second writ of mandate ordering the Santa Clara Superior Court to vacate its prior order that accepted Intuitive Surgical’s redactions of investigator Andrea Smethurst’s reports and related investigative materials. The court held Intuitive had waived attorney-client privilege and work-product protection by placing the scope and adequacy of the investigations at issue in defending Paknad’s employment discrimination and retaliation claims. The court directed the trial court to conduct further in camera review and to disclose all factual findings and other information relevant to the investigations’ scope or adequacy, even if that material would otherwise qualify as core work product.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted Kiran Kimbrough's application for discretionary appeal from a decision involving the City of Atlanta. The court ordered that the appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the April 8, 2026 order and directed the Clerk of Superior Court to include this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. The order formally accepts discretionary review and initiates the appellate filing deadline and record transmission procedures.

The Court of Appeals granted Ardalan Karbasyoun's application for discretionary appeal from a final judgment in favor of Foamworks Alpharetta, LLC. The court concluded the trial-court order disposed of the entire case and therefore was a final, appealable order under Georgia law. Because a right of direct appeal exists for such final judgments, the Court granted the application and instructed Karbasyoun to file a notice of appeal in the trial court within ten days. The trial-court clerk must include this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

The Court of Appeals granted a writ of mandamus directing Cuyahoga Common Pleas Judge Kevin J. Kelley to follow this court’s prior mandate in JTC Solutions I. Relator JTC Solutions had argued the trial court failed to conduct the additional factfinding and explain the evidence supporting its ruling after this court reversed the trial court’s initial voiding of an arbitration clause. The appellate court found the January 5, 2026 entry granting arbitration ignored the express remand instructions to (1) inquire whether the arbitration clause is enforceable and applies to each claim and (2) state findings and evidence. The court denied the judge’s motion to dismiss and ordered compliance.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the City of Atlanta's application for an interlocutory appeal in the case styled City of Atlanta v. Ronald Frank Petty, Jr. The court ordered that the appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the order and directed the Clerk of Superior Court to include this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. The order is procedural: it authorizes an immediate appeal before final judgment and sets a short deadline for filing the notice and for inclusion of the order in the appellate record.

The Court of Appeal granted The Merchant of Tennis’s petition for extraordinary writ and directed the trial court to modify its curative notice scheme regarding roughly 954 individual settlement agreements (ISAs) obtained by Merchant from putative class members. The trial court had found the ISAs voidable as procured by fraud or coercion and ordered a curative notice advising members they could rescind and join the class without having to immediately return settlement payments (though payments could be offset against any later recovery). The appellate majority concluded the trial court must follow California rescission statutes and preserved the judgment, adding that each side bear its own costs on appeal.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted an application for interlocutory appeal filed by Fowl Life Foods, LLC in the case against Matthew Gray. The court's order allows the appellant to file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the order (dated April 1, 2026) and directs the superior court clerk to include this order in the record sent to the Court of Appeals. The decision is procedural: the court accepted review of an otherwise non-final interlocutory matter and set the filing and record-transmission requirements to effectuate that review.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted Chick‑fil‑A, Inc.'s application for an interlocutory appeal in the case Chick‑fil‑A, Inc. v. Matthew Gray. The court ordered that the appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the April 1, 2026 order and directed the Superior Court clerk to include this order in the record sent to the Court of Appeals. This is an administrative order allowing the interlocutory appeal to proceed, not a decision on the merits of the underlying dispute.

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted an application for discretionary appeal filed by Wirth Forestry, LLC and others in a case against Heard County, Georgia. The court ordered that the appellants may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the order and instructed the Clerk of the Superior Court to include this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. The order simply grants permission to pursue an appeal and sets procedural steps for transmitting the record; it does not decide the merits of the underlying dispute.