Court Filings
8 filings indexedRecent court opinions cross-linked with public notices by case number, summarized and classified by AI.
Mason v. Mason
The Florida First District Court of Appeal denied Kevin Gregory Mason's petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a lower-court matter involving Edith Knapp Mason. The court, acting in its original jurisdiction, issued a per curiam order on April 27, 2026, simply stating 'DENIED' without published opinion or extended reasoning. All three judges concurred. The order notes the decision is not final until any timely authorized rehearing motion is resolved.
OtherDeniedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida1D2025-3405Elizabeth Collins v. Sean Collins
The Fifth District Court of Appeal denied Elizabeth Collins's emergency second petition seeking a writ of prohibition, other extraordinary relief, and an immediate constitutional stay against the trial judge. The court issued a short per curiam order denying the petition and cited Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.330(i) and Delgado v. Miller as supporting authority. No respondent appeared, and three judges concurred. The denial is subject to any timely authorized motion under the appellate rules.
OtherDeniedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida5D2026-0890Armando Arce v. Chief Judge Timothy D. Osterhaus
The Florida Supreme Court denied pro se petitioner Armando Arce’s mandamus request to remove Chief Judge Timothy D. Osterhaus’s circuit judge Jennie Kinsey from administrative supervision of First Judicial Circuit cases. The Court found Arce’s filings were frivolous attempts to circumvent prior denials and recusal efforts related to two Okaloosa County domestic-relations cases, and it imposed a filing restriction: the Clerk must reject any future filings by Arce concerning those two case numbers unless signed by a licensed Florida lawyer. The Court expressly retained jurisdiction earlier and declined motions for rehearing.
OtherDeniedSupreme Court of FloridaSC2025-1811Paizes v. State of Florida
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal denied Spiros C. Paizes's petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a Hillsborough County circuit court decision. The petition was considered on its merits and the appellate court, in a brief per curiam order, concluded relief was not warranted and denied the petition. All three judges concurred. No additional reasoning or detailed factual background was provided in the published entry.
OtherDeniedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida2D2025-2996Roberson v. State of Florida
The First District Court of Appeal denied Walter Jim Roberson Jr.'s petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The court exercised its original jurisdiction to consider the petition and, without an opinion, entered a per curiam order denying relief. The denial means the court found no basis to grant the petition or to disturb the underlying appellate result. The decision was issued April 16, 2026, and three judges concurred.
Criminal AppealDeniedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida1D2025-1869Evans v. Dixon
The Florida First District Court of Appeal denied Matthew Evans's petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an action involving the Florida Department of Corrections. The decision was per curiam, with three judges concurring, and no published opinion or substantive reasoning is provided in the order. The denial leaves in place the lower court or administrative action Evans challenged; the court noted the decision is not final until any timely motion under the appellate rules is resolved.
Habeas CorpusDeniedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida1D2025-1138Dawson v. State of Florida
The Florida First District Court of Appeal, in its original jurisdiction, denied on the merits Charles Dawson’s amended petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The petition was filed August 13, 2025, and the court issued its per curiam decision on April 16, 2026. The court reviewed the claims presented and concluded they did not establish ineffective assistance sufficient to warrant relief, so the petition was denied without remand or other relief.
Criminal AppealDeniedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida1D2025-2028Chadwick Willacy v. State of Florida & Chadwick Willacy v. State of Florida
The Florida Supreme Court denied Chadwick Willacy’s requests for public records and related relief after the Governor signed his death warrant. Willacy had sought records from FDOC and other state agencies about Florida’s lethal-injection protocol and interagency communications; the circuit court denied those motions and refused rehearing or in camera review. The Supreme Court treated his appeal as a Rule 9.142(c) petition, found Willacy failed to show the records were tied to a colorable postconviction claim (and were therefore an impermissible fishing expedition), and denied his petition and his habeas petition, dismissed his appeal of an extension request, and denied oral argument.
Criminal AppealDeniedSupreme Court of FloridaSC2026-0519 & SC2026-0526