Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Matter of Dunn

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherGranted
Filed
Jurisdiction
New York
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Type
Opinion
Case type
Other
Disposition
Granted
Citation
2026 NY Slip Op 02766

Application for voluntary resignation from the roll of attorneys for non-disciplinary reasons

Summary

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, accepted Karen Clinton Dunn's application to resign from the Bar for non-disciplinary reasons and ordered her name removed from the roll of attorneys. The court treated the submission as a voluntary resignation not prompted by disciplinary charges and concluded acceptance was appropriate. The decision is a routine administrative action resolving Dunn's formal request to leave the bar without imposing discipline or further proceedings.

Issues Decided

  • Whether to accept an attorney's application to resign for non-disciplinary reasons
  • Whether the attorney's name should be removed from the roll upon acceptance of such an application

Court's Reasoning

The court found the resignation was for non-disciplinary reasons and properly presented for acceptance. Because the application met the court's requirements for a voluntary non-disciplinary resignation, the appropriate administrative remedy was to accept the resignation and remove the attorney's name from the roll. No disciplinary action was indicated or imposed.

Parties

Resignor
Karen Clinton Dunn
Judge
Curran
Judge
Bannister
Judge
Montour
Judge
Greenwood
Judge
Hannah

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-05-01
Filing/Document filed date
2026-04-28

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Confirm removal and update records

    The court will remove Dunn's name from the roll; affected agencies and former clients should update their records to reflect her inactive status.

  2. 2

    If Dunn wishes to practice again

    She should consult counsel about the procedures for reinstatement, which typically require petitioning the court and meeting current licensing requirements.

  3. 3

    For former clients seeking counsel

    Clients should retain or consult other licensed attorneys to handle ongoing matters, and check whether a successor attorney is needed for open matters Dunn previously handled.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court accepted Karen Clinton Dunn's voluntary resignation for non-disciplinary reasons and removed her name from the roll of attorneys.
Does this mean she was disciplined?
No. The resignation was accepted for non-disciplinary reasons, and no disciplinary sanction was imposed by this decision.
Who is affected by this decision?
Karen Clinton Dunn is directly affected because she is no longer authorized to practice law in New York after removal from the roll.
Can this decision be revisited or appealed?
Decisions accepting voluntary non-disciplinary resignations are administrative; any further challenge would be unusual and would require a proper legal basis and timing to seek relief.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
Matter of Dunn - 2026 NY Slip Op 02766

Matter of Dunn

2026 NY Slip Op 02766

May 1, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

MATTER OF KAREN CLINTON DUNN, AN ATTORNEY, RESIGNOR.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on May 1, 2026

-

Present: Curran, J.P., Bannister, Montour, Greenwood, And Hannah, JJ. (Filed Apr. 28, 2026.)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Application to resign for non-disciplinary reasons accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys
.