What did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decide?

The court affirmed the Commonwealth Court's order, meaning it declined to change the lower court's decision.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the appeal — the Koger Family and the named state agencies and officials — are directly affected because the lower-court outcome remains in place.

Does this order explain the court's reasoning?

No. This is a brief per curiam order that affirms the lower court without a written opinion in this document.

Can this be appealed further?

This is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision; further direct appeal in state courts is not available, though federal review might be possible only if a federal question or constitutional claim is implicated and a timely petition for certiorari is filed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Koger, T., Aplt. v. PA Housing Finance Agency

Docket 29 WAP 2025

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 30, 2026 · yesterday
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Type: Unanimous Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 29 WAP 2025

Appeal from the Commonwealth Court's September 5, 2025 order, consolidated as an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (No. 29 WAP 2025).

Summary

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the Commonwealth Court's order on April 30, 2026, resolving an appeal brought by Elliot-Todd Parker Koger and Todd Elliott Koger Sr. (the "Koger Family") against multiple state entities and officials including the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency and county court officers. The Supreme Court issued a short per curiam order that simply states the Commonwealth Court's decision is affirmed, without extended opinion or additional reasoning in this document. The procedural posture shows this appeal follows the Commonwealth Court's September 5, 2025 order in a matter previously litigated and identified at this Court's earlier docket entries.

Issue Decided

Whether the Commonwealth Court's order should be reversed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the appeal filed by the Koger Family.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam order that affirms the Commonwealth Court's decision; no separate opinion or elaborated legal reasoning is provided in this document. By affirming, the Supreme Court effectively adopted the disposition below and declined to overturn the Commonwealth Court's ruling.

Parties

Appellant: Elliot-Todd Parker Koger and Todd Elliott Koger Sr. (the Koger Family)
Appellee: Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency
Appellee: Mary McGinley, in her official capacity as Judge, Fifth Judicial District Court of Common Pleas
Appellee: Benjamin Kohler, in his official capacity as Prothonotary, Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appellee: Kevin Kraus, in his official capacity as Allegheny County Sheriff
Appellee: Issac Usoroh
Judge: Per Curiam (Pennsylvania Supreme Court)

Key Dates

Supreme Court decision date: 2026-04-30
Commonwealth Court decision date: 2025-09-05

What You Should Do Next

1
Review the Commonwealth Court opinion
Obtain and review the Commonwealth Court's September 5, 2025 opinion to understand the substantive rulings and factual findings that the Supreme Court affirmed.
2
Consult counsel about further review options
If you believe a federal constitutional issue exists, consult an attorney promptly to evaluate the viability and timing of seeking U.S. Supreme Court review or other post-judgment remedies.
3
Comply with the lower-court mandate
Implement or comply with any orders, deadlines, or executory processes that the Commonwealth Court's decision requires, since that decision remains in force.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decide?: The court affirmed the Commonwealth Court's order, meaning it declined to change the lower court's decision.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the appeal — the Koger Family and the named state agencies and officials — are directly affected because the lower-court outcome remains in place.
Does this order explain the court's reasoning?: No. This is a brief per curiam order that affirms the lower court without a written opinion in this document.
Can this be appealed further?: This is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision; further direct appeal in state courts is not available, though federal review might be possible only if a federal question or constitutional claim is implicated and a timely petition for certiorari is filed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                             WESTERN DISTRICT


ELLIOT-TODD PARKER KOGER AND TODD               No. 29 WAP 2025
ELLIOTT KOGER SR., JOINTLY AND
INDIVIDUALLY AS THE "KOGER FAMILY"              Appeal from the Order of the
IDENTIFIED AT PAHAF 19868 THAT WAS              Commonwealth Court dated
AFFIRMED BY THIS COURT AT 777 C.D.              September 5, 2025, at No. 175
2022,                                           MD 2025.

                   Appellants


             v.


PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY, MARY MCGINLEY, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE, FIFTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS, BENJAMIN KOHLER, IN HIS
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PROTHONOTARY,
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA,
KEVIN KRAUS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFF, AND
ISSAC USOROH,

                   Appellees




                                    ORDER


PER CURIAM                                            DECIDED: APRIL 30, 2026
     AND NOW, this 30 th day of April, 2026, the order of the Commonwealth Court is

AFFIRMED.