Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started
NoticeRegistry
Try Pro

In re: Nom. of LaVelle; Appeal of: LaVelle

Docket 9 EAP 2026

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Type
Lead Opinion
Case type
Other
Disposition
Affirmed
Judge
Brobson, P. Kevin
Docket
9 EAP 2026

Appeal from the Commonwealth Court's order concerning a nomination-petition challenge for the May 19, 2026 primary election.

Summary

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted the candidate Mark Lavelle leave to file an amended jurisdictional statement and to supplement his brief after receiving trial notes, but otherwise affirmed the Commonwealth Court's prior order. The appeal concerned Lavelle's nomination petition for the Democratic primary for the 177th Legislative District. The court noted jurisdiction and allowed procedural relief to complete the appellate record, while concluding that the Commonwealth Court's disposition should stand. A concurring opinion was filed by Justice Brobson, joined by Justices Dougherty and Mundy.

Issues Decided

  • Whether the Supreme Court should exercise jurisdiction over this appeal from the Commonwealth Court regarding a nomination petition for a primary election.
  • Whether the appellant should be permitted to file an amended jurisdictional statement.
  • Whether the appellant should be allowed to supplement the appellate brief after receipt of notes of testimony from the lower proceeding.

Court's Reasoning

The Court found that it could and would note jurisdiction over the appeal and that permitting the appellant to amend the jurisdictional statement and to supplement the brief was appropriate to ensure a complete record. After allowing these procedural remedies, the Court determined the Commonwealth Court's decision on the underlying nomination-petition matter was correct and therefore affirmed that order. The concurring statement indicates agreement with the outcome though for possibly different or additional reasons.

Parties

Appellant
Mark Lavelle
Appellee
Commonwealth Court (order below)

Key Dates

Submission date
2026-04-01
Decision date
2026-04-07
Primary election date
2026-05-19
Commonwealth Court docket (underlying) year
2026-01-01

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consult counsel about the effect of the affirmed order

    Discuss with an attorney how the Commonwealth Court's affirmed order affects ballot status and any remaining administrative or legal remedies before the election.

  2. 2

    Complete supplemental filings

    If not already done, file the amended jurisdictional statement and submit the supplemental brief after receiving the March 23, 2026 notes of testimony as permitted by the Court.

  3. 3

    Consider further legal options promptly

    If there are potential federal constitutional claims or emergency relief options, evaluate them immediately because the May 19 primary date is imminent.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Supreme Court decide?
The Court allowed procedural fixes to the appeal (amending the jurisdictional statement and supplementing the brief) but otherwise affirmed the Commonwealth Court's order challenging the nomination petition.
Who is affected by this decision?
Mark Lavelle, the candidate who filed the nomination petition, is directly affected; the Commonwealth Court's ruling on his petition remains in force.
What happens next?
The Commonwealth Court's order stands; if further legal options exist, those would depend on specific statutory or procedural avenues, but the Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision.
Can this decision be appealed further?
This is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, so there is generally no further state appellate review; federal review would be available only on narrow federal constitutional grounds and via separate procedures.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                               EASTERN DISTRICT


 IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF MARK                :   No. 9 EAP 2026
 LAVELLE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY                  :
 NOMINATION FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN                  :   Appeal from the order of the
 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FROM THE                     :   Commonwealth Court at docket
 177TH LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT IN THE MAY             :   No. 122 MD 2026
 19, 2026 PRIMARY ELECTION                         :
                                                   :   SUBMITTED: April 1, 2026
                                                   :
 APPEAL OF: MARK LAVELLE                           :


                                         ORDER


PER CURIAM                                                       DECIDED: April 7, 2026
        AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2026, Appellant’s Application for Relief to File an

Amended Jurisdictional Statement is GRANTED and jurisdiction is noted; Appellant’s

Application for Relief to Supplement the Appellant’s Brief Once the Notes of Testimony from

March 23, 2026 Are Received is GRANTED; and the order of the Commonwealth Court is

hereby AFFIRMED.

        Justice Brobson files a concurring statement in which Justices Dougherty and Mundy

join.