Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

In Re Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v. the State of Texas

Docket 03-26-00343-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

AdministrativeDenied
Filed
Jurisdiction
Texas
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Type
Lead Opinion
Disposition
Denied
Docket
03-26-00343-CV

Original mandamus proceeding from Travis County seeking appellate relief against a lower-court action

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals (Third District) denied the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services' petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissed its motion for temporary emergency relief as moot. The court issued a short memorandum opinion resolving the original mandamus proceeding from Travis County without further opinion. The denial means the appellate court declined to order the lower court or official to take the specific action the Department sought; the emergency motion was unnecessary following that disposition.

Issues Decided

  • Whether the Department was entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling a specific action by the lower court or another official
  • Whether emergency temporary relief was warranted pending resolution of the mandamus petition

Court's Reasoning

The court denied the petition for mandamus, indicating it was not persuaded that the extraordinary remedy was appropriate. Because the petition was denied, the related request for temporary emergency relief became unnecessary and was dismissed as moot. The memorandum opinion did not provide extended factual or legal analysis.

Parties

Petitioner
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Judge
Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Judge
Justice Theofanis
Judge
Justice Crump

Key Dates

Filed
2026-04-21

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consult appellate counsel

    The Department should talk with appellate counsel to evaluate whether any further appellate relief is available or appropriate given the denial.

  2. 2

    Evaluate alternative remedies

    Consider pursuing any ordinary appeals, motions, or other procedures in the trial court that could address the underlying dispute.

  3. 3

    Comply with existing orders

    Unless and until a higher court provides relief, follow the trial-court orders or status quo that the mandamus petition sought to change.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court denied the Department's petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissed its emergency motion as moot.
Who is affected by this decision?
The immediate parties are the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and the lower-court entity or official the Department sought to compel; no further details are provided in the memorandum.
What happens next?
Because the mandamus petition was denied, the lower-court action remains in place; the Department may consider other appeals or relief if available.
Can this be appealed?
Mandamus denials are typically subject to limited further appellate review, and the Department could consult counsel about potential further steps, such as seeking review in a higher court if a basis exists.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                    NO. 03-26-00343-CV




                 In re Texas Department of Family and Protective Services




                    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



                           MEMORANDUM OPINION


              The petition for writ of mandamus is denied, and the motion for temporary

emergency relief is dismissed as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



                                            __________________________________________
                                            Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Filed: April 21, 2026