In Re Juan Guevara Torres; E-Nnovations Technologies and Marketing, LLC; And Digital Data Technologies LLC v. the State of Texas
Docket 03-26-00137-CV
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Court
- Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- Type
- Lead Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Denied
- Docket
- 03-26-00137-CV
Original mandamus proceeding challenging trial-court proceedings in a Travis County civil case
Summary
The Texas Third Court of Appeals denied a petition asking the court to issue a writ of mandamus to control proceedings in a Travis County case. The court also lifted a previously entered stay of the underlying trial-court proceedings. The court issued a short memorandum opinion denying relief under the appellate rules and returning the case to the trial-court process, without further comment or substantive analysis in this brief disposition.
Issues Decided
- Whether a writ of mandamus was warranted to control or direct the trial court's handling of the underlying civil case
- Whether the appellate court should continue a stay of the underlying trial-court proceedings
Court's Reasoning
The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, indicating that the petitioner did not establish entitlement to the extraordinary relief sought. Because mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and the petition failed to meet the required standards, the court also concluded that the previously imposed stay should be lifted so the trial-court proceedings may continue.
Authorities Cited
- Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), 52.10
Parties
- Petitioner
- Juan Guevara Torres
- Petitioner
- E-Nnovations Technologies and Marketing, LLC
- Petitioner
- Digital Data Technologies LLC
- Judge
- Maggie Ellis
Key Dates
- Opinion filed
- 2026-04-09
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Resume trial-court proceedings
Parties should prepare to proceed in the Travis County court now that the appellate stay is lifted, including meeting upcoming deadlines and hearings.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further relief
If petitioners believe extraordinary relief remains available, they should promptly consult appellate counsel to evaluate whether to seek mandamus from a different court or pursue other remedies.
- 3
Review trial-court strategy and preservation
Parties should review and preserve record issues and objections in the trial court to protect any potential future appeals.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus and lifted the stay on the underlying case, so the trial-court proceedings may resume.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The petitioners (Juan Guevara Torres, E-Nnovations Technologies and Marketing, LLC, and Digital Data Technologies LLC) and the parties in the underlying Travis County civil case are affected because the trial will proceed without the appellate stay.
- What happens next in the underlying case?
- With the appellate stay lifted, the trial court and the parties should resume litigation and any scheduled proceedings or deadlines in the trial court.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Mandamus orders can sometimes be challenged by further mandamus petitions to a higher appellate court or, in limited circumstances, by other extraordinary relief, but options depend on procedural rules and the specifics of the case; consult counsel promptly to evaluate any further appellate remedies.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00137-CV
In re Juan Guevara Torres; E-Nnovations Technologies and Marketing, LLC; and
Digital Data Technologies LLC
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). We lift
the stay of the proceedings in the underlying case. See id. R. 52.10.
__________________________________________
Maggie Ellis, Justice
Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis
Filed: April 9, 2026