James Kristopher Limon v. Rosa Flores
Docket 08-26-00013-CV
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Court
- Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
- Type
- Lead Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Dismissed
- Docket
- 08-26-00013-CV
Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Travis County, Texas, dismissed for want of prosecution after appellant failed to file a brief or request an extension.
Summary
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas dismissed James Kristopher Limon's appeal for want of prosecution. Limon failed to file his brief by the March 21, 2026 deadline, did not request an extension, and did not comply with the clerk's ten-day notice. Applying Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), the court dismissed the appeal. The opinion is a short memorandum concluding dismissal is warranted where a party fails to prosecute and does not seek an extension after notice.
Issues Decided
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution where the appellant failed to file a brief by the deadline.
- Whether dismissal is appropriate when the appellant did not request an extension after being given notice under the appellate rules.
Court's Reasoning
The court relied on the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure that require an appellant to file a brief and allow dismissal if the appellant does not comply. After the clerk notified the appellant that the appeal could be dismissed unless a brief and extension motion were filed within ten days, the appellant still took no action. Because the procedural rules were not followed and the appellant failed to prosecute, dismissal was appropriate under the cited rules.
Authorities Cited
- Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1)
- Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b)
Parties
- Appellant
- James Kristopher Limon
- Appellee
- Rosa Flores
- Judge
- Gina M. Palafox
Key Dates
- brief due date
- 2026-03-21
- decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult an attorney
If the appellant believes dismissal was improper or has a good excuse, consult counsel promptly to evaluate options for seeking reinstatement or other relief.
- 2
Consider motion to reinstate
If eligible, the appellant may seek reinstatement of the appeal by filing a motion explaining the failure to prosecute and showing diligence, following the appellate rules and deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does this decision mean?
- The appeals court dismissed the case because the appellant did not file the required appellate brief or ask for more time after being notified; the dismissal ends this appeal.
- Who is affected by this dismissal?
- Primarily the appellant, James Kristopher Limon, whose appeal is dismissed; the appellee, Rosa Flores, prevails on this procedural ground.
- Can this dismissal be reversed?
- A dismissed appeal may sometimes be reinstated if a timely motion for reinstatement with a satisfactory explanation is filed, but relief is not guaranteed and must follow the applicable rules.
- What were the legal grounds for dismissal?
- The court relied on the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure permitting dismissal for want of prosecution when an appellant fails to file a brief and does not respond to a clerk's notice.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
————————————
No. 08-26-00013-CV
————————————
James Kristopher Limon, Appellant
v.
Rosa Flores, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1
Travis County, Texas
Trial Court No. C-1-CV-25-006476
M E MO RA N D UM O PI NI O N
James Kristopher Limon’s brief was due on March 21, 2026. When none was filed, the
Clerk of this Court notified Limon that this appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if
he did not file a brief and a motion for extension within ten days. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Limon
neither timely filed a brief nor requested an extension. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want
of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
April 16, 2026
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
2