Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started
NoticeRegistry
Try Pro

Patrick Minor v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

Docket 04-26-00136-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilDismissed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Texas
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Type
Lead Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Dismissed
Docket
04-26-00136-CV

Appeal from the trial court's denial of a motion for default judgment

Summary

The Fourth Court of Appeals dismissed Patrick Minor's appeal challenging the trial court's denial of his motion for a default judgment for lack of jurisdiction. The court explained that denials of default judgments are ordinarily interlocutory and not appealable before entry of a final judgment. The court ordered Minor to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed; he did not respond, so the court dismissed the appeal. The decision rests on Texas law that interlocutory orders denying default judgment cannot be appealed until the underlying case is finally resolved.

Issues Decided

  • Whether the denial of a motion for default judgment is immediately appealable
  • Whether the appellate court had jurisdiction to hear Minor's appeal prior to final judgment

Court's Reasoning

Texas law treats the denial of a default judgment as an interlocutory order that is not immediately appealable; an appeal of such an order may proceed only after entry of a final judgment in the underlying case. The court gave the appellant an opportunity to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, and because Minor did not respond, the court concluded it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal.

Authorities Cited

  • Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(a)
  • Aguilar v. Livingston154 S.W.3d 832 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.)
  • Samuels v. Tex. Workforce Comm’nNo. 04-25-00063-CV, 2025 WL 984588 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 2, 2025, no pet.)

Parties

Appellant
Patrick Minor
Appellee
Kentucky Fried Chicken
Judge
Mary Lou Alvarez

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-15

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Proceed in trial court

    Continue litigating in the trial court on the merits or seek a different procedural remedy there, since the denial of default judgment is not presently appealable.

  2. 2

    Wait for final judgment

    If a final judgment is entered in the underlying case, consider appealing the denial of default judgment as part of that final-judgment appeal.

  3. 3

    Consult counsel about other remedies

    Talk with an attorney about whether any discretionary or extraordinary appellate relief is available or whether to pursue motions in the trial court to renew or preserve arguments.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court dismissed the appeal because it lacked jurisdiction to review the trial court's denial of a motion for default judgment before a final judgment in the case.
Who is affected by this decision?
The appellant, Patrick Minor, is affected because his appeal is dismissed; the trial court's denial of default judgment remains in place for now.
What happens next in the underlying case?
The underlying case proceeds in the trial court; Minor may pursue relief there or wait until a final judgment is entered and then appeal from that final judgment.
Can this dismissal be appealed?
Generally, dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is not itself appealable to the same appellate court; Minor could consider further appellate remedies if available, but typically one must await final judgment to appeal the denial of default.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
Fourth Court of Appeals
                                     San Antonio, Texas
                                MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                        No. 04-26-00136-CV

                                          Patrick MINOR,
                                              Appellant

                                                 v.

                                 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN,
                                        Appellee

                     From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2025-CI-24851
                           Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
                  H. Todd McCray, Justice
                  Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2026

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           Patrick Minor challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for default judgment.

Ordinarily, the denial of a default judgment is an interlocutory order and not subject to appeal. See

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(a); Aguilar v. Livingston, 154 S.W.3d 832, 833 (Tex. App.

Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.). Such an order may be appealed only after the entry of a final

judgment in the underlying proceeding. See Samuels v. Tex. Workforce Comm’n, No. 04-25-00063-

CV, 2025 WL 984588 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 2, 2025, no pet.); S. Pioneer Prop. & Cas.
                                                                                04-26-00136-CV


Ins. Co. v. Wilson, No. 01-17-00444-CV, 2018 WL 3384558, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st

Dist.] July 12, 2018, no pet.).

       We therefore ordered Minor to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for

lack of jurisdiction. Minor has not responded. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.


                                                PER CURIAM




                                               -2-