Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Sandra Flores and Anita M. Flores v. Propel Tax and Javier Hernandez

Docket 13-26-00173-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilDismissed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Texas
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Type
Lead Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Dismissed
Docket
13-26-00173-CV

Appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas; parties filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal.

Summary

The Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District granted an agreed motion to dismiss an appeal brought by Sandra Flores and Anita M. Flores against Propel Tax and Javier Hernandez. The parties told the court they resolved their dispute and asked for dismissal. The court granted the motion under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, dismissed the appeal, taxed the appellate costs to the appellants, and declined to consider any motion for rehearing because the appeal was dismissed at the parties' request.

Issues Decided

  • Whether the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to the parties' agreed motion to dismiss under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
  • Whether appellate costs should be taxed against the appellants under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(d).

Court's Reasoning

The court accepted the parties' representation that they resolved their dispute and requested dismissal, which is permitted by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because the dismissal was by agreement, the court followed the rule that absent agreement the appellant bears costs and thus taxed costs against the appellants. The court also declined to consider rehearing motions after dismissing the appeal at the parties' request.

Authorities Cited

  • Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 42.1(d)

Parties

Appellant
Sandra Flores
Appellant
Anita M. Flores
Appellee
Propel Tax
Appellee
Javier Hernandez
Judge
Jenny Cron

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-09

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Confirm settlement terms

    If you are a party, ensure the settlement agreement resolving the dispute is finalized and all required actions under it are completed.

  2. 2

    Pay taxed costs

    Appellants should arrange payment of the appellate costs that were taxed against them, or consult counsel if there is a dispute about those costs.

  3. 3

    Close the matter with trial court if needed

    If further filings or dismissals are required in the trial court to reflect the settlement, coordinate with counsel to file any necessary documents.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court granted the parties' agreed motion and dismissed the appeal.
Who pays the appellate costs?
The court taxed appellate costs against the appellants, Sandra and Anita Flores.
Does this mean the underlying dispute was decided on the merits by the appeals court?
No. The dismissal was by agreement of the parties, indicating they resolved their dispute outside of an appellate merits decision.
Can a party ask the court to reconsider this dismissal?
The opinion states no motion for rehearing will be entertained because the appeal was dismissed at the parties' request.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
NUMBER 13-26-00173-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

SANDRA FLORES
AND ANITA M. FLORES,                                                      Appellants,

                                           v.

PROPEL TAX
AND JAVIER HERNANDEZ,                              Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

         ON APPEAL FROM THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT
                 OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

        Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron
                Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron

      This matter is before the Court on an agreed motion to dismiss. In said motion, the

parties represent to us that they have resolved their differences and now request that we

dismiss the appeal.
       The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that it should be granted.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and

the appeal is hereby dismissed.

       The costs are taxed against the appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal

at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.


                                                                 JENNY CRON
                                                                 Justice

Delivered and filed on the
9th day of April, 2026.




                                              2