What did the court decide?

The court denied Austin Achieve Public Schools' petition for a writ of mandamus and did not grant the extraordinary relief sought.

Who is affected by this decision?

The petitioner, Austin Achieve Public Schools, is directly affected because their request for mandamus relief was denied; other parties are not named in the short opinion.

Does the opinion explain why the petition was denied?

No. The memorandum opinion simply states the petition is denied and cites the applicable appellate rule without further explanation.

Can this decision be appealed?

Mandamus denials by an intermediate court are generally not further appealable except in limited circumstances; the document does not discuss any appellate remedies or rehearing options.

Austin Achieve Public Schools v. the State of Texas

Docket 03-26-00341-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherDenied

Filed: Apr 30, 2026 · 6 days ago
Jurisdiction: Texas
Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Type: Lead Opinion
Case type: Other
Disposition: Denied
Docket: 03-26-00341-CV

Original mandamus proceeding in the Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus from actions taken in Travis County.

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals (Third District) denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Austin Achieve Public Schools in an original proceeding from Travis County. The court issued a short memorandum opinion and explicitly denied the requested extraordinary relief under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. No detailed reasoning or factual background is provided in the published entry beyond the denial and the citation to the rule governing mandamus procedure.

Issue Decided

Whether the court should issue a writ of mandamus to grant the petitioner the requested extraordinary relief.

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a brief memorandum that states only the procedural disposition: the petition is denied. The court cites the appellate rule governing mandamus dispositions but does not provide further factual findings or legal analysis in the published entry.

Authorities Cited

Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

Parties

Petitioner: Austin Achieve Public Schools
Judge: Gisela D. Triana
Judge: Kelly
Judge: Ellis

Key Dates

Filed: 2026-04-30

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult counsel about alternatives
The petitioner should consult its attorney to evaluate other remedies, such as filing a petition for review if appropriate or pursuing relief in the trial court, depending on the underlying dispute.
2
Consider motion for rehearing
If there are grounds, the petitioner may ask its counsel whether to file a motion for rehearing in the Court of Appeals within the applicable deadline.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The court denied Austin Achieve Public Schools' petition for a writ of mandamus and did not grant the extraordinary relief sought.
Who is affected by this decision?: The petitioner, Austin Achieve Public Schools, is directly affected because their request for mandamus relief was denied; other parties are not named in the short opinion.
Does the opinion explain why the petition was denied?: No. The memorandum opinion simply states the petition is denied and cites the applicable appellate rule without further explanation.
Can this decision be appealed?: Mandamus denials by an intermediate court are generally not further appealable except in limited circumstances; the document does not discuss any appellate remedies or rehearing options.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-26-00341-CV




                                 Austin Achieve Public Schools




                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



                                            __________________________________________
                                            Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: April 30, 2026