In Re Alisa Ann Golz v. the State of Texas
Docket 03-26-00170-CV
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Court
- Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- Type
- Lead Opinion
- Case type
- Other
- Disposition
- Denied
- Docket
- 03-26-00170-CV
Original (emergency) mandamus proceeding in the Texas Court of Appeals reviewing a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief
Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals (Third District) denied an emergency petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Alisa Ann Golz and dismissed her emergency motion for temporary relief as moot. The court issued a short memorandum opinion without extended discussion, simply directing that the petition be denied and the temporary relief motion dismissed under the appellate rules governing emergency pleadings and relief. No further reasoning or factual findings are stated in the published entry.
Issues Decided
- Whether the court should grant an emergency writ of mandamus to the petitioner
- Whether the petitioner’s emergency motion for temporary relief should be granted or dismissed as moot
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a brief memorandum order denying the mandamus petition and finding the emergency motion for temporary relief moot under the applicable appellate rules. The decision reflects the court’s determination that emergency relief was not warranted or was no longer necessary, though no extended factual or legal explanation was provided in the opinion.
Parties
- Petitioner
- Alisa Ann Golz
- Judge
- Darlene Byrne
- Judge
- Theofanis
- Judge
- Crump
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
Talk with an attorney promptly to evaluate whether to seek further review from the Texas Supreme Court or pursue alternative relief in the trial court.
- 2
Assess mootness posture
Determine whether circumstances have changed such that a new emergency application or a different procedural route is appropriate.
- 3
Comply with lower-court orders
If the mandamus sought to alter or suspend a lower-court order, make sure to comply with that order unless other relief is obtained.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The court denied the emergency petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissed the emergency motion for temporary relief as moot.
- Who does this affect?
- The decision directly affects the petitioner, Alisa Ann Golz, by denying her requested extraordinary relief.
- Why did the court dismiss the emergency motion as moot?
- The court stated the motion was moot under the appellate rules, indicating the temporary relief sought was no longer needed or appropriate; no further factual explanation was provided.
- Can this be appealed?
- Mandamus denials by an intermediate appellate court generally have limited further appeal options, though a party could seek review in the Texas Supreme Court; consult counsel for appellate strategy.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00170-CV
In re Alisa Ann Golz
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The emergency petition for writ of mandamus is denied and the emergency
motion for temporary relief is dismissed as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), (d).
__________________________________________
Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump
Filed: April 23, 2026