What did the court decide?

The appellate court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, so it refused to order the trial court to take or stop the action the petitioner requested.

Who is affected by this decision?

The immediate effect is on the petitioner, Estephania Norma LeBaron, and the underlying trial-court matter in Travis County; the trial court's ruling remains in place.

What are the legal grounds for the denial?

The court concluded that the petitioner did not satisfy the requirements for extraordinary mandamus relief under the appellate rules, as reflected by the denial under Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Can this be appealed?

Mandamus denials by an intermediate appellate court are generally not subject to further appeal to that court, though a petition for review to the Texas Supreme Court could be considered in appropriate circumstances; consult counsel promptly about review options.

In Re Estephania Norma LeBaron v. the State of Texas

Docket 03-26-00394-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherDenied

Filed: Apr 30, 2026 · 6 days ago
Jurisdiction: Texas
Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Type: Lead Opinion
Case type: Other
Disposition: Denied
Docket: 03-26-00394-CV

Original proceeding: petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from actions of a Travis County trial court

Summary

The Texas Third Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Estephania Norma LeBaron in an original proceeding from Travis County. The court summarily concluded relief was not warranted and denied the petition under the appellate rules, without issuing further written reasons in this memorandum opinion. The decision leaves the trial court's actions undisturbed and declines to compel the requested extraordinary relief.

Issues Decided

Whether the petitioner was entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to act or refrain from acting as requested
Whether extraordinary relief was appropriate under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

Court's Reasoning

The court applied the standard for mandamus relief under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and found that the petitioner did not meet the requirements for extraordinary relief. Because the petition failed to show entitlement to mandamus, the court denied the requested writ. The opinion was issued as a brief memorandum order without extended factual or legal discussion.

Authorities Cited

Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

Parties

Petitioner: Estephania Norma LeBaron
Judge: Chari L. Kelly

Key Dates

Filed: 2026-04-30

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
Speak with an attorney experienced in mandamus and appellate practice to evaluate whether further review to the Texas Supreme Court or other remedies are viable given the denial.
2
Consider alternative relief in trial court
If mandamus was sought to address a trial-court action, assess and pursue available motions or procedures in the trial court that might address the underlying issue.
3
Evaluate petition for review
If appropriate, prepare and file a petition for review to the Texas Supreme Court promptly, adhering to the rules and deadlines for such filings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, so it refused to order the trial court to take or stop the action the petitioner requested.
Who is affected by this decision?: The immediate effect is on the petitioner, Estephania Norma LeBaron, and the underlying trial-court matter in Travis County; the trial court's ruling remains in place.
What are the legal grounds for the denial?: The court concluded that the petitioner did not satisfy the requirements for extraordinary mandamus relief under the appellate rules, as reflected by the denial under Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Can this be appealed?: Mandamus denials by an intermediate appellate court are generally not subject to further appeal to that court, though a petition for review to the Texas Supreme Court could be considered in appropriate circumstances; consult counsel promptly about review options.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-26-00394-CV




                               In re Estephania Norma LeBaron




                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



                                            __________________________________________
                                            Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: April 30, 2026