Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

In Re Geoji, Inc. v. the State of Texas

Docket 03-26-00049-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherDenied
Filed
Jurisdiction
Texas
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Type
Lead Opinion
Case type
Other
Disposition
Denied
Docket
03-26-00049-CV

Original proceeding (petition for writ of mandamus) from Travis County

Summary

The Texas Third Court of Appeals denied Geoji, Inc.'s petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a trial-court action. The appellate court issued a short memorandum opinion simply stating denial and citing the appellate rule allowing such disposition. No extended reasoning, factual background, or separate opinion was included in the published entry. The decision concludes the original proceeding from Travis County without granting the extraordinary relief requested by the petitioner.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the petitioner was entitled to issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel or prohibit trial-court action

Court's Reasoning

The memorandum opinion contains only the court's disposition—denial of the petition—and does not provide substantive analysis or factual findings. The court invoked its authority under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to issue the denial without an extended opinion. Because no legal rationale is stated in the memorandum, no further application of law to facts is provided.

Authorities Cited

  • Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

Parties

Petitioner
Geoji, Inc.
Judge
Maggie Ellis

Key Dates

Filed
2026-04-16

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consult appellate counsel

    Talk with an attorney experienced in appellate and mandamus practice to evaluate whether to seek relief from the Texas Supreme Court or pursue alternative remedies in the trial court.

  2. 2

    Review trial-court options

    Consider other procedural pathways in the trial court, such as interlocutory appeals if available, motions to modify the order at issue, or compliance while preserving objections for later review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court denied Geoji, Inc.'s petition for a writ of mandamus and did not grant the extraordinary relief it sought.
Why did the court deny the petition?
The memorandum opinion states only the denial and cites the appellate rule allowing such disposition; it does not explain the court's detailed reasoning.
Who is affected by this decision?
Geoji, Inc. (the petitioner) is directly affected because the requested mandamus relief was denied; the trial-court action challenged remains in effect.
Can this be appealed further?
A denial of mandamus by an intermediate court is generally final with limited appellate options; a party seeking further relief should consult counsel about possible applications to the Texas Supreme Court or other procedural options.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-26-00049-CV




                                           In re Geoji, Inc.




                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



                                               __________________________________________
                                               Maggie Ellis, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: April 16, 2026