Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started
NoticeRegistry
Try Pro

In Re Tereza Kacerova v. the State of Texas

Docket 03-26-00318-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherDenied
Filed
Jurisdiction
Texas
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Type
Lead Opinion
Case type
Other
Disposition
Denied
Docket
03-26-00318-CV

Original proceeding seeking a writ of mandamus from the Texas Court of Appeals (Third District) out of Travis County.

Summary

The Texas Third Court of Appeals, in an original mandamus proceeding arising from Travis County, denied the petition for a writ of mandamus. The court issued a brief memorandum opinion concluding the petitioner was not entitled to the extraordinary relief sought and cited the appellate rule governing disposition. No further explanation or relief was provided in the opinion, and the denial resolves the petition without granting any mandamus relief.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the petitioner was entitled to issuance of a writ of mandamus from the Court of Appeals

Court's Reasoning

The court determined that the petitioner was not entitled to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. The opinion is a concise denial referencing the appellate rule for disposition and provides no further factual or legal findings in support of mandamus relief. Because the standard for granting mandamus was not satisfied, relief was denied.

Authorities Cited

  • Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

Parties

Petitioner
Tereza Kacerova
Judge
Chari L. Kelly

Key Dates

Filed
2026-04-10

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consult appellate counsel

    Discuss whether grounds exist to seek rehearing in the court of appeals or to petition the Texas Supreme Court for mandamus or other relief, and evaluate timing and likelihood of success.

  2. 2

    Consider petition for review

    If appropriate, prepare and file a petition for review or other permissible appellate filing within applicable deadlines to pursue further relief.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus and did not grant the extraordinary relief requested.
Who is affected by this decision?
The petitioner, Tereza Kacerova, is directly affected because her request for mandamus relief was denied.
What happens next?
The petitioner can consider seeking further relief in a higher court if permitted, or seek rehearing in the appellate court within applicable deadlines.
On what legal basis was the petition denied?
The court relied on the standards and its authority under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for disposition of mandamus petitions, specifically citing Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-26-00318-CV




                                     In re Tereza Kacerova




                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



                                            __________________________________________
                                            Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: April 10, 2026