Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

In Re WC 4th and Rio Grande LP v. the State of Texas

Docket 03-26-00079-CV

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherDenied
Filed
Jurisdiction
Texas
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Type
Lead Opinion
Case type
Other
Disposition
Denied
Docket
03-26-00079-CV

Original proceeding (petition for writ of mandamus) from Travis County

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by WC 4th and Rio Grande LP in an original proceeding from Travis County. The court issued a brief memorandum opinion concluding the petition did not warrant mandamus relief and cited the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. No further explanation of the merits or factual background was provided in the published entry, and the court simply denied the requested extraordinary writ.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the petitioner was entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling action or prohibiting action by a lower court or official

Court's Reasoning

The court determined the petition did not meet the standards for mandamus relief under the applicable appellate rules. The opinion is a short memorandum denial that does not elaborate on factual findings or legal analysis, indicating the petition failed to justify the extraordinary remedy.

Authorities Cited

  • Texas Rules of Appellate ProcedureTex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

Parties

Petitioner
WC 4th and Rio Grande LP
Judge
Chari L. Kelly

Key Dates

Filed
2026-04-16

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consult appellate counsel

    Discuss whether seeking mandamus from the Texas Supreme Court or pursuing the underlying case through ordinary appellate procedures is appropriate.

  2. 2

    Consider alternatives to mandamus

    Evaluate procedural or substantive motions in the trial court or ordinary appeals that could address the relief sought.

  3. 3

    Review the trial-court record

    Gather and analyze the full lower-court record to determine if additional grounds exist to support further appellate relief.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus; the petitioner will not receive the extraordinary relief it sought from this court.
Who is affected by this decision?
The petitioner, WC 4th and Rio Grande LP, is directly affected because its request for mandamus relief was denied; other parties or lower-court officials are not identified in the opinion.
What does a denial of mandamus mean?
A denial means the appellate court concluded the conditions for granting an extraordinary writ were not satisfied, so it will not intervene in the underlying matter via mandamus.
Can this decision be appealed?
Denials of mandamus by an intermediate court are generally not appealable in the ordinary sense, though a petitioner may seek mandamus relief from a higher court (such as the Texas Supreme Court) if appropriate.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-26-00079-CV




                               In re WC 4th and Rio Grande LP




                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



                                            __________________________________________
                                            Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: April 16. 2026